Terms of FLAST NEWS RSSThu, 28 Sep 2023 22:27:50 GMTCase Outline document for interim hearing refers to the official Form produced by the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia found here Case Outline document for interim hearing | Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (fcfcoa.gov.au)

]]>Thu, 28 Sep 2023 22:27:50 GMTCase Outline document for final hearing refers to the official form supplied by the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia found here Case Outline document for final hearing | Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (fcfcoa.gov.au).

]]>Thu, 28 Sep 2023 22:26:27 GMTThis term describes the FLAST (Family Law Australia Support and Training) Artificial Intelligence system in general and applies to FLAST Artificial Intelligence products such as our FLAST-AI App (https://ai.flast.com.au) and our FLAST-AI Private Server Legal Research Assistant   

]]>Thu, 28 Sep 2023 22:24:10 GMTMazorski v Albright [2007] FamCA 520; (2007) 37 Fam LR 518 - where Brown J indicated that a meaningful parental relationship is one which is important, significant and valuable to the child concerned.  

]]>Wed, 08 Jun 2022 16:37:38 GMTMazorski v Albright [2007] FamCA 520; (2007) 37 Fam LR 518 - where Brown J indicated that a meaningful parental relationship is one which is important, significant and valuable to the child concerned.  

]]>Wed, 08 Jun 2022 12:59:31 GMTBeck & Beck [1983] FamCA 7; (1983) FLC 91-318 - defined earning capacity as a capacity to obtain income which could be used to provide maintenance ... and not merely as current income from personal exertion or from the use of personal skills.

]]>Wed, 08 Jun 2022 12:53:22 GMTC v C (Abduction: Rights of Custody) [1989] 1 WLR 654 - held that the rights of custody may be in the court, the mother, the father, some caretaking institution, such as a local authority, or it may, as in this case, be a divided right-in so far as the child is to reside in Australia, the right being that of the mother; but, in so far as any question arises as to the child residing outside Australia, it being a joint right subject always, of course, to the overriding rights of the court.

]]>Wed, 08 Jun 2022 12:45:48 GMTDickons v Dickons (2012) 50 Fam LR 244; [2012] FamCAFC 154 - held that the classification of contributions by reference to terms such as “initial contributions”, “contributions during the relationship”, and “post-separation contributions”, can be helpful as a convenient means of giving coherent expression to the evidence in a s 79 case and to giving coherence to the nature, form and extent of the parties’ respective contributions. 

]]>Wed, 08 Jun 2022 12:45:08 GMTLK v Director-General, Department of Community Services (2009) 237 CLR 582; [2009] HCA 9 - provides that application of the expression “habitual residence” permits consideration of a wide variety of circumstances that bear upon where a person is said to reside and whether that residence is to be described as habitual. 

]]>Wed, 08 Jun 2022 12:38:25 GMTDyquiangco Jr. v. Tipay 2022 ONSC 1441 - where the consistency with decisions of courts of comparable Western democracies is relied upon in giving the evidence considerable weight.  Cox v DP World Brisbane Limited [2021] FCA 1335 - where the court regards the consistency with decisions of other Australian courts in giving the evidence considerable weight. 

]]>Wed, 08 Jun 2022 12:31:52 GMT